ad-free
A marketplace for speech.
82,204 Hours of Speech
help
help
513,985 Transcriptions
add title (free)
add title (free)
407 Sources
add source €0.99
add source €0.99
Search:
Newsbud
Title: They Lied About Iraq, They Lied About Libya, They’re Lying About Syria!
Published: 2018-04-16
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cku8yc6NBEc
Title: They Lied About Iraq, They Lied About Libya, They’re Lying About Syria!
Published: 2018-04-16
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cku8yc6NBEc
1/14
If you have all this evidence run it by Congress, I mean, this is not claiming that the Congress is going to do its job and have a vote, you know, based on what is best for the Americans and what is best actually for the world. Because when you look at these sold out hoars in Congress, what do you see? And I'm going to repeat that again,2/14
sold out hoars in Congress. What you're going to see is they are pocketed by people who are profiting from these missiles being sent to Syria. This is why we always emphasize, take a look at the history, take a look at the context, take a look at the pretext and then try to put the two and two and two together. Now, who do we know as a3/14
nation that has the track record of the number one top constant users of chemical weapons? Honestly. Okay, now taking sides here. Now if you look at the history, the recent history included, we are looking at the United States. We have Agent Orange, we have the nuclear bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We have consistently engaged in this type of unethical, I mean, that's literally putting it mildly awful,4/14
atrocious, anti-humanitarian methods of waging wars. And these are the wars we wage and then we go and then we dump all the weapons, the chemical, nuclear in other countries. So that's one. The other thing we need to look at is how many times we have seen this damn story. And this is the same scenario, okay? It was not that long ago, okay, less than two decades5/14
ago, 15 years ago, we had our people, the United States government, before billions of people televised in the United Nation. This man Colin Powell getting up and saying, we have the proof. Gravity of this moment is matched by the gravity of the threat that Iraq's weapons have mass destruction posed to the world. Let me now turn to those deadly weapons programs and describe why they are6/14
real and present dangers to the region and to the world. First biological weapons. When Iraq finally admitted having these weapons in 1995, the quantities were vast. Less than a teaspoon of dry anthrax, a little bit about this amount. This is just about the amount of a teaspoon. Less than a teaspoon full of dry anthrax in an envelope shut down the United States Senate. And Sodom Hussein7/14
has not verifiably accounted for even one teaspoon full of this deadly material. And that is my third point. And it is key. Iraqis have never accounted for all of the biological weapons they admitted they had. And we know they had. They have never accounted for all the organic material used to make them. And they have not accounted for many of the weapons filled with these agents8/14
such as there are 400 bombs. This is evidence, not conjecture. This is true. This is all well documented. All these barrel satellite image that you see show that Iraq, Saddam Hussein has all this WMD. After hundreds of thousands of that and destruction and the death also applies to American soldiers as well. Okay. It was, oops, see, Daisy. We didn't find anything. And then we didn't even9/14
get any apology, any reparation, nothing. It was, it was faulty intelligence. The main reason we went into Iraq at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn't, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction. But I also talked about the human suffering in Iraq. Well, first of all, I have it lined. President Bush did not10/14
lie. Dick Cheney did not. Colin Powell who made the presentation to the United Nations did not. Those weapons of mass destruction got to be somewhere. When you have that kind of track record, of course you're going to see even if there was something real people are going to legitimately question what you're putting forth here. Okay. It's like cry wolf. You, we don't believe this government when11/14
they accuse other governments of using WMD period unless there is independent verification independent investigation. UN is their own mouthpiece. NATO is not the independent. Russians are not the independent investigation. And that brings a question, well, who would we even consider independent? We can't even consider the neighboring country. Iraq is already our colony. Then we have Israel with its own interest and objective. Then you have Turkey12/14
that has already gone into Syria and has declared its own war. Okay. Who would, who would, who would, who would determine to be the independent objective body, international body to go in their conduct test and come out with report? So first of all, we don't know if any chemical weapons were released on people in Syria. That's number one. Okay. Number two, put aside all the political13/14
knowledge, put aside everything. Let's just use common sense and ask yourself why in the world Assad would hand the Western governments who have been set on invading and regime change in Syria in a platter in a silver plate, give them the excuse to engage in this war and attack. Why would Assad do such a thing? Okay. Just common sense. Let's put aside everything. Whether you're pro