ad-free
A marketplace for speech.
82,484 Hours of Speech
help
help
516,432 Transcriptions
add title (free)
add title (free)
407 Sources
add source €0.99
add source €0.99
Search:
Newsbud
Title: The Real Trump-Biden Differences the Media Is NOT Telling You About (Unplugged!)
Published: 2020-11-08
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dONKVyZ7rT0
Title: The Real Trump-Biden Differences the Media Is NOT Telling You About (Unplugged!)
Published: 2020-11-08
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dONKVyZ7rT0
1/168
Hello everyone! This is another one of my unplugged, unprepared, unedited video sessions where I'm going to just talk. It may end up being so long that I may call it or title it. My fellow busserer talk with everything that's been happening or not happening because everything has boiled down to post-election craze and COVID craze. I'm one of those people who checks, news, analysis, reports daily, everyday2/168
for three, four hours and in the past six, seven days I have not seen anything, really anything newsworthy as if the entire world has come to this halt. It has been placed on this pause and it's understandable because the elections here in the United States does not affect and does not involve only this country. Maybe the elections itself does, although we have all these foreign lobbies,3/168
etc. Unfortunately in our country and it ends up being by default influenced by other countries and players to a certain degree. But even without that, the US is the US. And the US sets the tone for the rest of the world whether you like it or not. And you have the entire world watching, waiting and wondering what's going to happen. And with the count, the vote4/168
count, I have been going through this post-election pause. And I'm sure many of you are going to identify with this because it's true. In fact, I announced it on Twitter, on social media. This is the first time I voted since 2004. And I'm going to talk about that in a second why, what prompted me to vote this time. And I have unplugged from all mainstream media5/168
for so long since about 2003, 2004. And it was so mesochistic because like a masochist, I ended up watching several mainstream media channels simultaneously. Because I'm simultaneously during this entire count business, I was watching ABC, CNN, RT and a little bit off and on Fox News. I'm going to go ahead and scrunch my face with every single one of those because I hate all of them.6/168
I have not, I have not watched any of these channels since 2004. But I was watching these channels not because I wanted to find out about real facts or get real information. I was watching all these mainstream media channels as an observer, as an analyst paying attention to how they were reporting things. The wording, the wording, words are so important. Words are so powerful. For example,7/168
words they were using when, let's say, candidate Biden was grabbing a less-day lead in certain county or in a certain state versus words used for the exact same situation for when President Trump was getting ahead in a certain city or a certain county or a certain state. It was amazing, amazing, amazingly consistent. It was so hypocrisy-ridden in such an obvious way. I remember way back when8/168
people were saying they are inserting these hidden codes that you can't even detect, you know, via naked eyes, to influence people, to program people. Remember, you know, there were all these discussions on that. Well, I say they don't have to do anything like that. It is out in the open. It is so transparent and also so consistent. So consistent that is the level of it is9/168
truly mind-boggling, truly mind-boggling. Well, it was nauseating, it was excruciating, but I did it. I sat there from Tuesday night around 9 p.m., 8 p.m., all the way till Saturday, till yesterday. I was switching between these channels and I was watching, I was listening, I was being disgusted. But I also, it also confirmed what I have been saying for years that the indoctrination, the programming, the10/168
propaganda effect of all these mainstream media outlets. I'm putting every single one of them in one bucket. Some people may come and say, if you are from the right, from the Republican side saying, oh no, Fox News is so much better. I have to completely disagree. It is equally disgusting. Equally disgusting. Anyhow, back to why I voted after so many years. Again for those of you11/168
who are not familiar with me, I have been independent forever. I have never registered with one party or another party. I have never, ever followed the party line and I still don't. I still don't. In fact, for the sake of all transparency, in 2016, I watched the final debates for candidates on the internet, on my cell phone. And I didn't vote. I didn't vote for either12/168
candidate. I didn't vote for President Trump, candidate Trump back then. I found it ridiculous. First of all, even when he announced his candidacy, I thought it was just some kind of a joke, I thought, okay, this is for entertainment purposes. You weigh in this world, he's going to be a finalist. I kept thinking of him rightfully so at the time as this guy who had TV13/168
program and very theatrical and boy stress with this very interesting flamboyant background and with this program as you are fired and he's like, how can someone like that be a candidate or seriously be a candidate? So because he didn't have really any political track record, I didn't even pay attention. And I said, wow, look at where we have gotten. You have this candidate and you have14/168
that candidate, both of them equally, not viable for me. And the whole election process, unfortunately in our country, I'm sure it's the case in many other countries as well. It's so rigged, okay. It doesn't induce any confidence to say, yes, we are going to trust those software that they are using and people who actually have created or own or sold those software. And then of course15/168
you get into each state's own internal politics or people who are in charge of overseeing this entire voting process. I've never had any faith really in that, okay. And it's okay if some of you disagree and say, well, this is how we maintain our democracy. I really don't believe that our system mechanics at least of the system based on the types of people who are in16/168
charge to oversee those mechanics of the voting system never has induced any kind of confidence or faith in me back to why I voted. We have had President Trump for three and a half, almost four years in the office. And there are things that I have found positive, positive things that I didn't even expect. I thought I believed, I predicted that just like the Presidents before17/168
him, George W. Bush, Obama, there was going to be all these talks and promises and everything. But once they get into office, once they get into this White House, they go about doing the exact same thing. Because truly there was nothing, nothing separating George W. Bush from Obama or Obama from George W. Bush, as far as our perpetual wars, our fear mongering, our interventionist, foreign policy,18/168
our hawkish foreign policy is concerned. Yes, right now I'm talking about foreign policy. And I was wrong. I was wrong thinking that Trump was going to start doing the exact same thing. In fact, because of his personality, being so boisterous and so flamboyant, I was expecting to see even more wars. I thought this was going to be a guy who was going to constantly swirl his19/168
rope there and say, yeah, let's go and let's nuke the hell out of them. And that, similar to George W. Bush, that was what I was expecting. And considering that he didn't have any track record politically, I guess I was biased to start with because of the past, because of all the other presidents before him, I quickly made up my mind that that was what was20/168
going to happen. Well, it didn't. Because I did watch every single thing we did as a nation after his elections within foreign policy and specifically within the region where I am an expert, I'm an analyst dog, right? The Middle East, all right? Central Asia, Caucasus. And I watched, I really, really paid attention because I was reporting. I was analyzing our foreign policy practices. I was analyzing.21/168
I have been analyzing all the developments in that part of the world, which is a big part of the world, which is the epicenter of the majority of what we call the ethnic conflicts of the upheaval, the not having stable political system, always war-ridden either internally or externally or internally and externally simultaneously, right? He actually pulled our troops from Northern Syria. He refused to finish the22/168
job, the operation that Obama Clinton, Obama Biden Clinton started. You know, they toppled the government in Egypt that it was Libya. They went about destroying Libya and it was supposed to include other countries on the list. And next on the list was Syria and they started that process, right? They created Obama, Biden, Clinton, they created ISIS. As we created Al Qaeda in late 70s, early 80s23/168
against the Soviet Union, the communism back then, Obama Clinton Biden, they created ISIS, basically rebranding Al Qaeda as part of this plan, this hawkish plan of getting rid of toppling governments in these countries and later chop them into pieces. You know how we did it in the Balkans, Balkanization of the region, Balkanization of the Middle East area, okay? He not only did not continue that hawkish24/168
imperialistic foreign policy with Syria, he actually did he being trumped the opposite, including his decision to pull out our troops from Northern Syria and saying, you know what? Do whatever you want to do. We are not going to continue. I mean, not going to end up in this quagmire, okay? Sure, Russia had a major role in this because Russia didn't really step in with Libya, but25/168
it did with Syria. That's the only difference, okay? And of course, the Trump versus Biden, Clinton, Obama factor on the ground. That was good. That was good. And despite sanctions, which I don't agree with sanctions on Iran, we did not pursue this really aggressive outwardly hawkish, even inwardly hawkish policy with Iran, okay? And the same thing we're trying to get out of Afghanistan. We've been in26/168
Afghanistan since 2002, 2003. The heroin central, the heroin production central of the globe. So and even with his policies and what he did with Turkey, I know I am considered, I have been considered one of the top experts on Turkey, okay? That's my background, I speak the language. I spend a lot of time in Turkey, I travel there, I live there for two years until recently,27/168
until I came back. And even though the mainstream media with their propaganda style are giving it this flair, this false flair, that what Trump was doing was appeasing the sticktator. That's how they call them, Erdogan, whether you like him or not, in Turkey and by doing this stuff in regard to Syria. It's not true. The last thing Turkey wanted, the last thing the president there, Erdogan28/168
wanted, was for Trump to say, okay, fine, we're going to pull out our troop from Northern Syria, you're on your own Turkey. He was playing Syria as a card, as a bluffing card, so much, for so long. And it's like if you don't do this, we're going to do this with Russia in Syria, etc. In order to get things from the United States, whether it's financial,29/168
whether it has to do with certain weapons that they want Turkey to obtain for many reasons, right? It's this not blackmail, but it's like this poker bluffing attitude. And they did not want Trump. They did not want, at least the government in Turkey, they want Trump to come back and say, fine, you know what, with what's going on between you and the Kurds, we're going to30/168
get out. Now we're going to say, oh, this is abandoning the Kurds in the region. You get involved in that regional politics that has nothing to do with the United States interest in any way. The United States economic interest, the United States foreign policy interest, it doesn't. Will that allow, let's say, one side, let's say, in this case, Turkey to perhaps, perhaps, it hasn't happened yet,31/168
okay? Not to a large scale, massacres, certain group, let's say in this case, Kurds, yeah, there is that possibility. Is that horrible? Of course it is. Would that be heartbreaking? Of course it would be. But the United States has been in this or has been placed. Thanks to the EU, the whole notion of NATO, right? The United Kingdom, Israel, as forefront of everybody's conflict. We dishing32/168
out all the money. We establishing all these bases. Hey, the Soviet Union fell. This spin now, what, how many years has it been, it's been almost 30 years? The idea of putting all these bases, which cost trillions of dollars, maintaining these bases, also fighting other nations' wars for them, was coming to an end with these new, brand new, spanking new foreign policy attitude. Which I agreed33/168
with. I am anti-war. I am anti-intervention, okay? I hate this interventionist policy that the United States has been pursuing since World War II. In fact, that's why we got involved in World War II. I'm against that. I have always been against that. And I never, ever saw any president in the White House, in the United States, who went against that imperialistic, expansionist, interventionist, foreign policy platform34/168
until Donald Trump. Okay? Until Donald Trump. So that seemed that difference. Being anti-war, being anti-interventionism was one of the top reasons prompting me to go and vote because I know, I know that was a historical lab, wasn't it? Because it's not a happy ha-ha lab. I know what's going to happen. Once the legal votes are all counted and let's say he gains victory fair and square.35/168
He hasn't yet, and I'm going to get to that. I'm going to get to that. He hasn't yet. Once that happens, and if it is honestly, okay? Rightfully. Here it is here, all right? We may get disgusted, we may get really upset. We have to respect the wish of whatever majority, however little that says, this is who we want to cast vote for. Whether they are36/168
informed or not, whether they are misguided, whether they are indoctrinated, if it is fair and square. If it is just. If it is straightforward, we have to do that. We have to respect that. The other side didn't, okay? The other side didn't. The other side right from the start went with this notion of this is not the president we want to see in the White House,37/168
whether people elected him, whether it was fair and square or not, which was, I assume it was fair and square. I hope it was. And how did they show it? They showed it in action. And what they did, hindered our progress. Economically, informed policy domestically with civil rights, with everything, with even healthcare, you know why? because by this russian-gate, shenanigan, folks, witch hunt, you know how38/168
much of the time and resources were diverted for the White House, for this administration. In this despicable spat created by the other side, based on nothing. Instead of putting that focus, instead of putting that energy into getting things done that are urgent, whether within the realm of our public education or healthcare, even environment are infrastructure, right? There is this thing called opportunity cause. And it's not39/168
within this economic sphere that it is used. It is applicable to everything we do in life, right? The time and resource that is spent on this means the time and resources that are not to spend on why instead of Z. Okay? That's what happens. And the ultimate, ultimate victims, the ones who actually paid a price for the shenanigan that they did, they put in place and40/168
they dragged for four years, nearly four years, right? Who is it? Ultimately, it is with the people, whether you're a democrat, whether you're a republican, libertarian, green, atheist, christian, jute, it doesn't matter. It was with our tax dollars. And it was with the opportunity cost involved that took away from other things that we could have the administration, the White House could have spent their time on.41/168
That's like a double triple rabbi. And they did that. That was basically the group, the side, the party that said, we're not going to accept it. And what? Meaning what? We don't care about democracy and voting system or any of those stuff. We like the idea of notions as long as it's our guy, as long as it's our party, as long as it involves our ideology.42/168
Well, that's not liberties oriented or a federal system or the democracy, whether it's direct democracy or indirect democracy. It is not. That's what I'm talking about and I'm going to be talking about and that's the hypocrisy notion of it. Now, foreign policy with vast majority of the decisions or actions, this administration, Trump administration took as a geopolitical analyst, as an expert in this area, as a43/168
journalist, as a former government whistleblower, as of subal admins, I agree with it with the vast majority of it. I am telling you, I don't agree with sanctions unless they are really warranted. I didn't see it as warranted on Iran. Put those aside. I'm not saying they are not big deals. They are big deals, but as far as hawkish, perpetual war-oriented policies coming to a halt,44/168
coming to a stop, in action, I agreed with all of those because I am anti-war. I have been anti-war, I will always be anti-war. I have not come across a justified war yet in my lifetime. Okay, and I'm half a century old, okay, I'm old. That was one main reason. I like to see that continue. Think of all the trillions of dollars that are spent in45/168
these self-created, synthetically created, complex intervention, coups, wars. Think of a span for the things for us, we, the people, Americans, here in this country, and yes, we need those. And there is so much that should be done inside, internally, in our country. Coups, I said coups, interventions, including Arab Spring, concocted, designed by the Deep State via Biden-Obama Clinton administration. Ukraine designed putting place via Biden-Obama Clinton46/168
administration. Turkey, the attempted coup via CIA operatives and Gulen, concocted, implemented putting place by Biden-Obama Clinton administration. And there was going to be more. But Trump came to White House. We haven't engaged in these types of coups and interventions and unjust, which almost all of them are, unjust wars. I hate the term, you know, I hate the term humanitarian wars. What an oxymoron. I mean, humanitarian47/168
wars, who invented that term? Welcome the other side. Domestically speaking, I have to admit, and as I said, we have been bogged down with Russia gate leading to the Turkey gate, they started carving that out, that how could even have much time to get anything done in this country when you are bogged down with this witch hunt? Criminal, I mean, it should be declared criminal. There48/168
should be that gate going after people who damaged this nation financially, economically, with what they did. All those representatives, so-called representatives in Congress. Now domestically, I have to say, we haven't had much change that I liked because of maybe one big reason is all the Russia gate and all the shenanigans. But there are things that are important to me. And I haven't heard ever, President Trump49/168
referring to that. I have talked about some of these in the past, I can go ahead and mention a few. I consider this notion, this notion that exists only in our nation, in our country, for profit prisons, for profit jails, nauseating, immoral, unethical, wrong, so wrong. You know, it's or buts about it, so wrong. I want to see that eliminated. I know many people on the50/168
right, when you say, oh, there is another way, sort of saying for profit prisons, people they say private prison system, privatized prison system. So people who are, I believe, misguided on the right, as soon as you say, it shouldn't be privatized. They tag you as a socialist on communist and you want everything to be run by government. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, that's51/168
wrong. I'm even using a word here that the left hates. I'm saying it's immoral. As we know, that's one notion, that is one word that is not in within the vocabulary, dictionary of the left because they hate that word, moral, immoral. They say these types of things should have nothing to do with our criminal justice system and our laws, morality. Hello, everything is about morality. Otherwise,52/168
how do you think we came up? The entire world came up with laws saying stealing, fevery is wrong. Well, that is per moral code, okay? If you look at what we consider wrong, murder, okay? Looting, fevery. Well, look at every single religion in the world. Look at every single commandment within Christianity. Look at the base of Jewish religion, Islam. Every single religion says, thou shall not53/168
steal, okay? That's universal because immoral, it is wrong. So for them to come and say, what does morality have to do with it? It has to do everything. Our laws and before that are common laws, they are all based on what we consider right or wrong, what we consider moral or immoral. Well, the idea of entities making profit from people going to jail, so the more54/168
you send people, the more people, the more crimes committed, the more people commit crime, the more people sent to jail by tough, tough laws, okay? So maybe someone has two ounces of marijuana. We go to jail for six months, somebody, not the government, not the taxpayer, makes profit, a business makes profit. Well that has implications, that comes with implications, the implications being you're looking at this55/168
new industry created in our nation. And this industry happens to have lobby. This lobby, okay, their lobby happens to put money into the political system, whether into judges elections or the governors, if they are appointed to judges in certain states, who favor judges who would willingly, okay, right and left throw people in jail? Because then they make more money. Nobody should make profit from increasing crime56/168
and increase in population sent to jail. Okay, that is immoral. So whether you're on the left and you consider it as you tag it as human rights issue, conflict of interest issue, whether you're a Christian, you're on the right and you're saying it, okay, morality versus immoral, it's immoral, okay? Anything is true with many, not all, with many privatized military industries that we have put in57/168
place since the early 80s, okay? There is urban analyst, political, geopolitical, one of my, let's call it expertise is national security. I'm a criminal justice major, I have the increasing public policy. It's, it is risky, it is dangerous even from the national security perspective, our foreign security perspective. It is much harder to keep tap of all these contractors and subcontractors private, for profit, profit driven industries,