A marketplace for speech.
82,435 Hours of Speech
help
help
516,093 Transcriptions
add title (free)
add title (free)
406 Sources
add source €0.99
add source €0.99
Search:
Newsbud
Title: Just Out - Eva Bartlett Caught In A Lie In Official Rebuttal!
Published: 2018-03-23
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odhRqFv4k_8
Title: Just Out - Eva Bartlett Caught In A Lie In Official Rebuttal!
Published: 2018-03-23
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odhRqFv4k_8
1/6
After NewsBud published its 74-minute long video report, the self-proclaimed journalist Eva Bartlett has officially and publicly issued a rebuttal. Now, remember, both Billie and Bartlett refuse to provide answers and comments for our report despite numerous attempts by NewsBud inviting them to do so. In Bartlett's rebuttal, in response to NewsBud's well-documented report stating that Eva Bartlett blatantly lied and provided false statements about the Alcoots hospital bombing2/6
during her UN speech. Bartlett is now stating that the hospital was not reduced to rubble as MSF stated, completely ignoring the fact that Bartlett proclaimed the hospital was never bombed. Bartlett clearly walking back her previous statements on Twitter that has garnered little attention as it was only liked by two people and retweeted once. Bartlett never actually addresses her previous false statements that the hospital was never3/6
bombed, which was viewed by millions of people. Billie has also stated this while ignoring the initial false statement. Now, here is Eva Bartlett in her own words, clearly stating that the hospital was not bombed. I'm sure you've heard in the media that hospitals have been attacked. Well, this media is referring to the pockets of a lepo that were occupied by terrorists. And they have manufactured stories,4/6
and I can give you a precise account. In April of this year, there was a hospital called the Alcoots Hospital, which in a concerted effort, all media said was attacked and targeted and badly damaged by either the Syrians or the Russians. In fact, the Russians had satellite imagery showing that this hospital was in the same shape that it was in in October 2015. No difference. Therefore,5/6
it was not attacked. So, therefore, it was not attacked. So, therefore, it was not attacked. As you can see, despite the documented information in her own words, Bartlett continues to ignore the fact that these statements were not accurate. Vanessa Bealey and Eva Bartlett are still refusing to issue retractions on this gravely false information presented at the UN Peace Conference, viewed by millions. Now, how much do6/6
these false statements discredit the anti-war movement? This is a very serious question. We have been told by many, including those who personally know, Bealey and Bartlett, that these false statements cause significant damage. So why not set the record straight? This is only one example of many false statements reported by Vanessa Bealey and Eva Bartlett, who have yet to provide retraction.