ad-free
Channel / Source:
Sirius Disclosure
Published: 2018-04-04
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mC9UIqOmHUQ
The cytosine and the different aspects of the DNA molecule, they begin to switch and fall off because it gets oxidated. The oxidation is a process where it's exposed to the environment and living tissue begins to just get corrupted and breaks down. Now this is well established science that when you're dealing with old DNA, you cannot take that old DNA and take those changes that are really
the degradation of the DNA and say that's a mutation that caused a physical change in the organism. Does this make sense? I'm not wanting to get too technical here because I know we're talking not to a scientific public but a general public. But just imagine that something's been laying around for over 100 years with the environment to cane it and then a group of scientists at
Stanford and UCSF take it and say voila, we have found seven never before before seen combined bone syndromes that resulted in this unusual creature that looks nothing like a human being. And that's what they did. That's what they did. And it gets more complicated than that but I don't want to bore you. They basically took over a million places where there were these changes from the
degradation picked 60 some of them and had on places that would explain bone deformity and claim that those were new never before seen syndromes. Now this leap of conclusion that's in the article which went worldwide with the help of the intelligence community, I'm going to get to this in a moment so that it was on the front pages everywhere completely submarine the idea that this could
be an unusual new species or specimen. Notwithstanding the fact that Nolan and his colleagues knew about the Russian one, not withstanding the fact that Dr. Nolan himself told me that he knew that DNA that had been degraded out in the environment would have problems in terms of reaching these conclusions. And in one email he says he would not reach those conclusions. In fact in an email
dated on December 30th of 2013, in this email he states that the chances these genes would come up by chance meaning a mutation are infinitesimal. I'm quoting, well what happened? Where the next thing we know he is not at all talking, he cuts off communication with us. And I'm the principal investigator who supplied him this sample and spent tens of thousands of dollars to take a
whole research team over to Barcelona to get the CAT scans, the X-rays, the sample, etc. and so on. And he ends up joining up with this group, this T2, the Star's Academy group, with Tom DeLong, will get to this in a minute. And they facilitate the global fake disclosure that this is suddenly not, couldn't possibly ET related that the case is closed as they deformed human
fetus. First the problem with all of this is that the research paper he put out is so dense and unless you have a PhD in genetics you're not going to understand it. That's the first thing. Secondly, it appeared and got through the peer review of genome research. Everyone listening needs to contact Dr. Susman, S-U-S-S-M-A-N, and she is the editor of genome research and point out that
this paper, according to the top geneticists in the world, should have never made it through peer review, period, full stop. It would have gotten a zero rating is what he has stated. Number three, that they cherry-picked, it's sort of like dip-chaining, cherry-picking the intelligence to put Colin Powell in front of the UN to say, see, he has weapons to mess destruction, let's go in there and
have a $2 trillion war that kills hundreds of thousands of people. This is the scientific equivalent of what Dick Cheney did in terms of data, but because of people's respect for that journal and the fact that the corruption between the media and the intelligence community facilitated this obscure report on this obscure case being headlined front page news worldwide, the whole world thinks the case is closed
when my friends the case isn't even begun. Because there's another case it has to be done. We are calling for a full investigation of Stanford UCSF Cold Spring Harbor and Genome Research Magazine, the process of how this made it through peer review when this top global scientist has said absolutely it should never have been published. And also how was the data manipulated? Now last night I
received another report that where he said that in talking to 10 different molecular biologists and geneticists, not a single one thought the paper had any credibility. Now I'm a medical doctor, I am not a PhD geneticist. So I am relying on these other experts, but these other experts are saying this is completely without merit. Now how does something without merit make its way into one of
the most, if not the most, prestigious genetics research magazine on earth? How does that then become front page news on the New York Times and CNN? I think we need a full investigation for the possibility. Now we can't prove this of some kind of deliberate act of corruption. And if the process in academia on this has been corrupted, we are in very big trouble on this
planet because what that means is that the tricks that we're being done in the 50s and 60s, which we'll get to in a moment where the CIA, and we can prove this because we have documents under FOIA request, Freedom of Information Act, where the CIA, the deliberately has gone in to academic institutions, put people under some duress for some reason and forced them to say and
do things to change the scientific opinion. Let me give you one very famous example. Probably everyone listening knows about Project Blue Book. Project Blue Book was the kind of wind addressing research end of the Air Force in the United States looking into UFOs. The real action was going on in unacknowledged special access projects, which we expose in this book. If you haven't read this book, you
must get it. We are actually because of this emergency that's happened. We're putting this available for anyone to get it half off on our website at seriousdisclosures.com. And if you get the DVD that goes with this, you can get this for free. So you need to go and get it and read it and study it. We don't have time to go through all of that here
today. We have so much material to cover. But in 1969, the Air Force pretended to have an objective study of UFOs done, where it was predetermined that the UFOs were not real. And the head of the committee was a professor condon at the University of Colorado in Boulder. He was a renowned scientific figure. He assembled a lot of other very renowned scientific figures that he, but
he made one mistake. He got one honest scientist on his team named Dr. Robert Woods. Let me tell you what happened. And this is in the disclosure material. And you must read this. Dr. Woods was a senior research aerospace scientist at McDonald Douglas Aerospace, which became part of Boeing a few years ago. But at that time, and he worked with a new old man, McDonald personally.
Mr. McDonald and he worked together. So he was on this Condon Committee. And the Condon Committee, when he started bringing hard evidence of the facts and the truth, the professor condon personally went to the head of McDonald Douglas Aerospace, Mr. McDonald to get Dr. Woods fired. And get him not only all thrown off the Condon Committee, but fired from McDonald Douglas because Dr. Woods had such
integrity. He was saying, no, these are legitimate cases. Here are actual photographs, here are actual videos. Here's actually places where these have landed, here are government documents. And he was doing what I was, you know, this is sort of 50 years ago, of course. But, and luckily, old man, McDonald, was quite fond of Dr. Woods and said, no, I'm not going to fire you. And he
kept him on. But Dr. Woods was thrown off the Committee. The next thing you know, this fake committee headed up by Dr. Woods, issues are reports saying there's not, the UFOs aren't real. There's no reason for the government to study it. That's closed project blue book. And they use that report to close any government official publicly overseeing investigation of UFOs. One I'm telling you is fact,
I then, after I personally briefed a director of the CIA, James Wolsey, I put in a FOIA request and I got documents about the Condon Committee. And in the CIA documents, it explicitly says that Dr. Condon was working for them, was an asset of the CIA, and that this had to be kept away from the public knowledge because if it was known, it would be create
a public scandal. Now, why I am sharing with you here is not in debate. This is proven through FOIA requests. These are official government documents, not ones that have a questionable provenance or did someone forge them. These were officially released. I have them in my archive. The question becomes, and this is, I'm raising, this is a question we can't prove this yet. Is this what we're
witnessing, Carol, in front of our very eyes this past week or two, that we have another situation of unbelievable government collusion and corruption with academia resulting in what has happened to this poor, adicama skeleton. Now, Dr. Greer, I just want to mention this is what you have brought attention to that ties in with what I've been focusing on to the US-based command now. The whole purpose
of this secrecy, as you call it, the hoax, as one, brown called it, the last card, is about, that it says an in-vision 2020. This is another document that you have. The space dimension of military operations is actually being designed to, quote, protect US interests and investment, integrating space forces and now we're hearing space forces that are based band being turned into space forces into, quote,
war fighting capabilities across the full spectrum of conflict. And that's what you're leading this into. Yes, and here, and this is where I'm going to connect the dots over this course of this two-hour show. I'm trying to be methodical in what I'm presenting here. There are something very strange that happened. And at a certain point, we got an email from the director of, and this was
actually on the blog of the director of Sirius, and I'm going to, from, from, of, Calica. And about, and he said, states, he says Gary, Nolan, Dr. Nolan, was visited by agents from some form. This is not me saying this. This is Calica. From some form of federal level, he told me on the record on a phone call, which federal investigators most likely now have a,
their possession. Afterwards, he reversed his findings. Now he's working directly with former CIA and NASA experts in the UFO field on a multi-million dollar project. Now this was posted March 23rd, 2018, the day after this journal report appeared. There's some- In the anniversary of the introduction of the Strategic Defense Initiative Space-Based Web-Pens Program. Correct. Correct. Correct. Now I want to connect another dot. And this, I'm
bringing this up. I want to be careful here for legal reasons. I have a very trusted member of my team who has been, have been with me for a couple years, who also works with senior military officials in India and up to and including the president of the prime minister. He had a meeting with Tristan Harris. Tristan Harris is the, who I have also met with.
Tristan Harris is the Harris, as the Harris chair. He's the head of that trust that endows Dr. Nolan's chair at Stanford University. And Tristan Harris and his conversations with my colleague stated that the reason they had the change, the story on this was that there was too much pressure, that it was too explosive, that they were afraid. And what my associate said is that it was
quite clear there had been some sort of threat or inducement to cause them to not want to say what this skeleton, which anyone who wants to go on our website and look at it, who is a doctor or even a lay person will conclude certainly is not a human will will say. And apparently this was of such great concern, this contact flew all the way from
San Francisco after his meeting with Tristan Harris, whose trust is endowing the Harris chair that Dr. Nolan occupies at Stanford and comes back to meet with me in Washington to say something is very wrong here. And now this was about a year ago or so before this report came out. The next thing I know, which is very concerning to me, I get something from John Rapaport.
And John Rapaport is an investigative reporter who is drilling down on this strange little group known as the To the Starr's Academy. There's an aging rock star named Tom DeLong, who sort of headed it up, but he has apparently become some manipulated by many of these people in the intelligence community. And this report goes through who these folks are. Now let me just give in the
end and now we've learned that this Dr. Nolan, Gary Nolan at Stanford is a member of this team. One of them is a guy named Louise Elizondo. He was the Pentagon chief of a secret program from 2007 to 2012 to study and explore UFO activity. Of course it was all housed as a threat and it was funded in part by the Pentagon. Our tax dollars was
$22 million that then went to Bigelow Aerospace some of it. And this particular person, Elizondo, we did a research on him, Senator John Warner, who has been a member of the Kabul keeping the secret he's now retired and he's 90 years old. His son told me that one of his closest friends who just retired from the Office of Naval Intelligence stated that Elizondo was the master
counterintelligence disinformation person he had ever seen at the Pentagon. And he is the person in the center of this to the stars Academy group just giving you the facts. So I think what we need to do is stick with the facts here. Now there's another man Jim Simmy van. He's from the CIA directorate of operations for 25 years. Dr. Hal Putoff has been working with the
National Security Agency General Electric Sparey Stanford University interestingly and SRI International and regularly advises NASA and the Department of Defense and the Intelligence Communities. Chris Mellon, he served 20 years in the federal government deputy assistant secretary of defense for intelligence and interestingly is a descendant of Paul Mellon who along with Alan Dulles founded the CIA more about this later. Noram Khan who has a 30 year
history with CIA. And then you get down to the second page of his report Dr. Gary Nolan of the Ratchford and Carlotta A. Harris professor in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at the School of Medicine at Stanford. And it goes on and on and on and on and on. Very worrisome because you will know them by the company they keep. And what I'm saying here
is there is this at the time that we handed off this precious one of a kind will never get a sample like this again of the bone marrow of this skeleton, the Atacama humanoid. Two Dr. Nolan. He was enthusiastic he reported to this top geneticist that there were amazing findings that 90% of the DNA didn't match to humans which is much much less than a chimpanzee
or a gorilla. And the next thing you know he's on this advisory group, chock full of counterintelligence spooks, CIA people, Pentagon people and then all of a sudden after five and a half years of a delay this report goes into the world's most prestigious genetics journal and gets headline news all over the place saying case closed there's nothing to this. This smells like the Condon committee.
It feels like the Robertson panel. Now what was the Robertson panel? A little bit of history in the 50s we have documents, a whole sheath of documents from the FOIA requests from the CIA that we did that describe the Robertson panel being a 1950s iteration of this process where they talked about engaging scientists to hoax UFO events and photograph them later come out and prove they